<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top 5 Tactical Mistakes on LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin</link>
	<description>Social Media for the Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I went back and took a look at the post an I&#039;m amazed what I missed the 2nd and 3rd time editing the post.  Makes me wonder if I made changes and the clicked of the page without saving the corrections.  Some were that blatant that either that happened or its time to rethink the glasses issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went back and took a look at the post an I&#8217;m amazed what I missed the 2nd and 3rd time editing the post.  Makes me wonder if I made changes and the clicked of the page without saving the corrections.  Some were that blatant that either that happened or its time to rethink the glasses issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

No apology needed on the spelling and punctuation errors.  It&#039;s a thorn in my side.  I try to proof each article yet they still bite me.  It&#039;s hard to see things clearly after you&#039;ve just written something.  And the time to go back and look at it never seems to happen.

I don&#039;t like them but I&#039;ve grown to accept them.  In response to this post I&#039;m going back through the post and when I&#039;m done they&#039;ll probably still be some there.  I think I need a personal editor for the blog.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>No apology needed on the spelling and punctuation errors.  It&#8217;s a thorn in my side.  I try to proof each article yet they still bite me.  It&#8217;s hard to see things clearly after you&#8217;ve just written something.  And the time to go back and look at it never seems to happen.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like them but I&#8217;ve grown to accept them.  In response to this post I&#8217;m going back through the post and when I&#8217;m done they&#8217;ll probably still be some there.  I think I need a personal editor for the blog.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Sean,

I&#039;m really sorry to say this, but there are spelling and punctuation errors in the article you wrote.  Otherwise, it is right on point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really sorry to say this, but there are spelling and punctuation errors in the article you wrote.  Otherwise, it is right on point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-304</guid>
		<description>JR,

Thanks for the comment.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Atkins</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Great content. The more LinkedIn is used, the greater the need to put into writting the social rules that have developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great content. The more LinkedIn is used, the greater the need to put into writting the social rules that have developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Laurie,

You may be more attractive to folks hunting business than I based on where you work.  Unsolicited invitations are somewhat like cold calls, but it depends upon the perspective of the recipient.  I periodically invite people I don&#039;t know to connect because I think they can be of value to my network or business.  In return though I make sure that I tell them how I can add value to their network.

If you think of unsolicited invitations like a cold call than archiving the invitation would be like ending the call.  Choosing IDK is like reporting them to the police for harassing you.  Likely if you Archive or don&#039;t respond to the invitation the person will not send another one.  There is nothing you personally can gain from choosing IDK other than being able to say to yourself &quot;That will teach that person to not send unsolicited invitations&quot;.

My quick thought is that if there is no benefit why do it.  It won&#039;t stop the next person from sending you a connection invitation.

As far as keeping your networking somewhat closed that is neither right nor wrong.  It&#039;s simply your choice.  If you&#039;re looking to monetize LinkedIn then its not good.  But if you want to strictly communicate with those you know and build a reference network then its fine.  As long as your profile is public though you will periodically get those connection invitations.

As far as being a gatekeeper do you specifically know that all of your connections are not interested in connecting to people they don&#039;t know?  Connecting to another doesn&#039;t expose your current connections anymore than them simply being in the LinkedIn database.  People can still find them through keyword searches, their other connections, etc.  I think that the perspective of protecting a network is a fallacy that people use to explain why they don&#039;t connect to others they don&#039;t know.

In the end however you choose to control your network and interact is your decision.  Do what works best for you.

Warm Regards,

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie,</p>
<p>You may be more attractive to folks hunting business than I based on where you work.  Unsolicited invitations are somewhat like cold calls, but it depends upon the perspective of the recipient.  I periodically invite people I don&#8217;t know to connect because I think they can be of value to my network or business.  In return though I make sure that I tell them how I can add value to their network.</p>
<p>If you think of unsolicited invitations like a cold call than archiving the invitation would be like ending the call.  Choosing IDK is like reporting them to the police for harassing you.  Likely if you Archive or don&#8217;t respond to the invitation the person will not send another one.  There is nothing you personally can gain from choosing IDK other than being able to say to yourself &#8220;That will teach that person to not send unsolicited invitations&#8221;.</p>
<p>My quick thought is that if there is no benefit why do it.  It won&#8217;t stop the next person from sending you a connection invitation.</p>
<p>As far as keeping your networking somewhat closed that is neither right nor wrong.  It&#8217;s simply your choice.  If you&#8217;re looking to monetize LinkedIn then its not good.  But if you want to strictly communicate with those you know and build a reference network then its fine.  As long as your profile is public though you will periodically get those connection invitations.</p>
<p>As far as being a gatekeeper do you specifically know that all of your connections are not interested in connecting to people they don&#8217;t know?  Connecting to another doesn&#8217;t expose your current connections anymore than them simply being in the LinkedIn database.  People can still find them through keyword searches, their other connections, etc.  I think that the perspective of protecting a network is a fallacy that people use to explain why they don&#8217;t connect to others they don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>In the end however you choose to control your network and interact is your decision.  Do what works best for you.</p>
<p>Warm Regards,</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Sean-
I can understand your point on the IDK button. It is a more positive approach to Archive, which I don&#039;t argue. However, what about individuals who work at or have done contract work for Fortune 100 companies that are difficult to get into? Sometimes they receive unsolicited requests from individuals with no connection to their network at all.
I have had individuals contact me asking to be added to my network and truly didn&#039;t know them in addition to not being in my network, plus they didn&#039;t personalize the message. I felt like they were just trying to use me or take advantage of my connections.  I understand the idea of LinkedIn is to grow your network but to have somone ping me that isn&#039;t even a connection of someone I know is a bit odd. Maybe I am old fashioned but I like to choose my associations carefully. Many times people judge you by those you are associated with and that&#039;s how you build a reputation, good or bad. I know I&#039;m not alone in this thought process as many of my connections feel the same way. They don&#039;t accept invites from people they don&#039;t work with or haven&#039;t worked with on a regular basis. I do understand sales, or business development positions are the exception since a significant portion of their role is about networking and generating leads.
As a professional gatekeeper of sorts, I find it important to be respectful of those people I am connected with to be careful which invites I accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean-<br />
I can understand your point on the IDK button. It is a more positive approach to Archive, which I don&#8217;t argue. However, what about individuals who work at or have done contract work for Fortune 100 companies that are difficult to get into? Sometimes they receive unsolicited requests from individuals with no connection to their network at all.<br />
I have had individuals contact me asking to be added to my network and truly didn&#8217;t know them in addition to not being in my network, plus they didn&#8217;t personalize the message. I felt like they were just trying to use me or take advantage of my connections.  I understand the idea of LinkedIn is to grow your network but to have somone ping me that isn&#8217;t even a connection of someone I know is a bit odd. Maybe I am old fashioned but I like to choose my associations carefully. Many times people judge you by those you are associated with and that&#8217;s how you build a reputation, good or bad. I know I&#8217;m not alone in this thought process as many of my connections feel the same way. They don&#8217;t accept invites from people they don&#8217;t work with or haven&#8217;t worked with on a regular basis. I do understand sales, or business development positions are the exception since a significant portion of their role is about networking and generating leads.<br />
As a professional gatekeeper of sorts, I find it important to be respectful of those people I am connected with to be careful which invites I accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Jitesh,

Thanks for the comments and the note to link to other articles a I mention.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jitesh,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments and the note to link to other articles a I mention.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitesh Madhwani</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitesh Madhwani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

Excellent &quot;common sense&quot; post. It can go a long way in improving everyone&#039;s experience on LinkedIn.

Just a suggestion, you mentioned about your &quot;top 5 strategic mistakes on LinkedIn&quot; article... it might be a good idea to link the phrase to that article itself.

Jitesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>Excellent &#8220;common sense&#8221; post. It can go a long way in improving everyone&#8217;s experience on LinkedIn.</p>
<p>Just a suggestion, you mentioned about your &#8220;top 5 strategic mistakes on LinkedIn&#8221; article&#8230; it might be a good idea to link the phrase to that article itself.</p>
<p>Jitesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanecia Wills-Leufroy</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanecia Wills-Leufroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Greetings Sean!
I agree with point one regarding the importance of editing to eliminate errors.  In terms of writing in general, I support reviewing your writing yourself in addition to spell check because of the examples of typos (an instead of can) you gave. I also know even with deligience we have errors so forgiving ourselves is important.

I am excited that as a newbie, I have already implemented the Archive instead of IDK as you have suggested.  I felt it was a kinder approach.  It looks like common sense and considering other&#039;s feelings prevails!  Once again I will be implementing your suggestions.  With much gratitude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings Sean!<br />
I agree with point one regarding the importance of editing to eliminate errors.  In terms of writing in general, I support reviewing your writing yourself in addition to spell check because of the examples of typos (an instead of can) you gave. I also know even with deligience we have errors so forgiving ourselves is important.</p>
<p>I am excited that as a newbie, I have already implemented the Archive instead of IDK as you have suggested.  I felt it was a kinder approach.  It looks like common sense and considering other&#8217;s feelings prevails!  Once again I will be implementing your suggestions.  With much gratitude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
