<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top 5 Tactical Mistakes on LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin</link>
	<description>Online Marketing and Social Media Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nelson</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Thanks for the RT.  You could write a book on the &quot;what not to do&#039;s&quot;.  

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Thanks for the RT.  You could write a book on the &#8220;what not to do&#8217;s&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markcampanale</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>markcampanale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Sean - great job.  I was just blindly solicited after posting a question in one of my groups,which prompted me to write my own &#039;what not to do&#039; blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Retweeting this now - thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean &#8211; great job.  I was just blindly solicited after posting a question in one of my groups,which prompted me to write my own &#39;what not to do&#39; blog.</p>
<p>Retweeting this now &#8211; thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Sean - great job.  I was just blindly solicited after posting a question in one of my groups,which prompted me to write my own &#039;what not to do&#039; blog.

Retweeting this now - thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean &#8211; great job.  I was just blindly solicited after posting a question in one of my groups,which prompted me to write my own &#8216;what not to do&#8217; blog.</p>
<p>Retweeting this now &#8211; thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary White</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>Thank you for additional excellent and well organized information.  Keep up the great work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cary W. White</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for additional excellent and well organized information.  Keep up the great work.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Cary W. White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I went back and took a look at the post an I&#039;m amazed what I missed the 2nd and 3rd time editing the post.  Makes me wonder if I made changes and the clicked of the page without saving the corrections.  Some were that blatant that either that happened or its time to rethink the glasses issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went back and took a look at the post an I&#8217;m amazed what I missed the 2nd and 3rd time editing the post.  Makes me wonder if I made changes and the clicked of the page without saving the corrections.  Some were that blatant that either that happened or its time to rethink the glasses issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

No apology needed on the spelling and punctuation errors.  It&#039;s a thorn in my side.  I try to proof each article yet they still bite me.  It&#039;s hard to see things clearly after you&#039;ve just written something.  And the time to go back and look at it never seems to happen.

I don&#039;t like them but I&#039;ve grown to accept them.  In response to this post I&#039;m going back through the post and when I&#039;m done they&#039;ll probably still be some there.  I think I need a personal editor for the blog.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>No apology needed on the spelling and punctuation errors.  It&#8217;s a thorn in my side.  I try to proof each article yet they still bite me.  It&#8217;s hard to see things clearly after you&#8217;ve just written something.  And the time to go back and look at it never seems to happen.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like them but I&#8217;ve grown to accept them.  In response to this post I&#8217;m going back through the post and when I&#8217;m done they&#8217;ll probably still be some there.  I think I need a personal editor for the blog.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Sean,

I&#039;m really sorry to say this, but there are spelling and punctuation errors in the article you wrote.  Otherwise, it is right on point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really sorry to say this, but there are spelling and punctuation errors in the article you wrote.  Otherwise, it is right on point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-304</guid>
		<description>JR,

Thanks for the comment.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Atkins</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Great content. The more LinkedIn is used, the greater the need to put into writting the social rules that have developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great content. The more LinkedIn is used, the greater the need to put into writting the social rules that have developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasonar.com/the-top-5-tactical-mistakes-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintuition.com/blog/?p=684#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Laurie,

You may be more attractive to folks hunting business than I based on where you work.  Unsolicited invitations are somewhat like cold calls, but it depends upon the perspective of the recipient.  I periodically invite people I don&#039;t know to connect because I think they can be of value to my network or business.  In return though I make sure that I tell them how I can add value to their network.

If you think of unsolicited invitations like a cold call than archiving the invitation would be like ending the call.  Choosing IDK is like reporting them to the police for harassing you.  Likely if you Archive or don&#039;t respond to the invitation the person will not send another one.  There is nothing you personally can gain from choosing IDK other than being able to say to yourself &quot;That will teach that person to not send unsolicited invitations&quot;.

My quick thought is that if there is no benefit why do it.  It won&#039;t stop the next person from sending you a connection invitation.

As far as keeping your networking somewhat closed that is neither right nor wrong.  It&#039;s simply your choice.  If you&#039;re looking to monetize LinkedIn then its not good.  But if you want to strictly communicate with those you know and build a reference network then its fine.  As long as your profile is public though you will periodically get those connection invitations.

As far as being a gatekeeper do you specifically know that all of your connections are not interested in connecting to people they don&#039;t know?  Connecting to another doesn&#039;t expose your current connections anymore than them simply being in the LinkedIn database.  People can still find them through keyword searches, their other connections, etc.  I think that the perspective of protecting a network is a fallacy that people use to explain why they don&#039;t connect to others they don&#039;t know.

In the end however you choose to control your network and interact is your decision.  Do what works best for you.

Warm Regards,

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie,</p>
<p>You may be more attractive to folks hunting business than I based on where you work.  Unsolicited invitations are somewhat like cold calls, but it depends upon the perspective of the recipient.  I periodically invite people I don&#8217;t know to connect because I think they can be of value to my network or business.  In return though I make sure that I tell them how I can add value to their network.</p>
<p>If you think of unsolicited invitations like a cold call than archiving the invitation would be like ending the call.  Choosing IDK is like reporting them to the police for harassing you.  Likely if you Archive or don&#8217;t respond to the invitation the person will not send another one.  There is nothing you personally can gain from choosing IDK other than being able to say to yourself &#8220;That will teach that person to not send unsolicited invitations&#8221;.</p>
<p>My quick thought is that if there is no benefit why do it.  It won&#8217;t stop the next person from sending you a connection invitation.</p>
<p>As far as keeping your networking somewhat closed that is neither right nor wrong.  It&#8217;s simply your choice.  If you&#8217;re looking to monetize LinkedIn then its not good.  But if you want to strictly communicate with those you know and build a reference network then its fine.  As long as your profile is public though you will periodically get those connection invitations.</p>
<p>As far as being a gatekeeper do you specifically know that all of your connections are not interested in connecting to people they don&#8217;t know?  Connecting to another doesn&#8217;t expose your current connections anymore than them simply being in the LinkedIn database.  People can still find them through keyword searches, their other connections, etc.  I think that the perspective of protecting a network is a fallacy that people use to explain why they don&#8217;t connect to others they don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>In the end however you choose to control your network and interact is your decision.  Do what works best for you.</p>
<p>Warm Regards,</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

